'Being
Earnest'
may serve as counterpoint to 'Attack of the Clones'
(The Hollywood
Reporter,
Apr. 26, 2002, by Martin A. Grove)
"Earnest"
excitement: Counterprogramming
is the Hollywood art of going after a totally different segment of the
audience when opening against a likely blockbuster.
A case in point
is Miramax's
"The Importance of Being Earnest," whose May 17 limited release follows
by one day the launch of "Star Wars: Episode II—Attack of the Clones."
"Earnest," Oscar Wilde's classic comedy of mistaken identity, stands to
score with a smaller audience of sophisticated big city moviegoers who
aren't likely to have "Clones" on their radar screens.
"Earnest," a
Fragile Film
presented by Miramax and Ealing Studios in association with Film
Council
and Newmarket Capital Group, is directed by Oliver Parker, who also
wrote
its screenplay based on Wilde's play. Produced by Barnaby Thompson, it
was co-produced by David Brown and executive produced by Uri
Fruchtmann.
Starring are Rupert Everett, Colin Firth, Frances O'Connor, Reese
Witherspoon,
Judi Dench and Tom Wilkinson.
Miramax's release
plan for
"Earnest" will see it arrive May 17 at about 20 theaters in 13 key
cities,
including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco,
Boston, Dallas, Washington, D.C., Detroit, Atlanta, Houston, Seattle
and
Minneapolis. As excitement about "Earnest" builds and word of mouth
spreads,
Miramax will go wider with it May 24, moving into about 50 more
theaters
in another 30 major markets.
After an
enjoyable early
look at "Earnest," I was happy to catch up with Parker, whose last
film,
the very engaging "An Ideal Husband," was also based on a Wilde classic
and was the focus of a column here in 1999. At the time, Parker had
been
giving thought to what his next project would be. Asked how it wound up
being "Earnest," he told me, "It wasn't actually going to be this,
necessarily.
This was going to happen, but there's another film I've been trying to
make for half my adult life, and I'm still trying to make that one....
Although Parker
had hoped
to make "Fade" after "Husband," he explained, "this one really came up
as an idea firstly and rather loosely when we were just shooting
'Ideal,'
but then more tangibly at the premiere of 'Ideal' when I was with
Barney
(Barnaby Thompson) and Harvey (Miramax co-chairman Harvey Weinstein).
Barney
had asked me to look it and I said, 'Yeah, I'd love to do it' and I
felt
a bit more comforted about it with 'Ideal' under my belt in that
originally
when I thought about doing Wilde in any way I was concerned that
'Earnest'
would be too theatrical in that it seems to be so quintessentially
that.
But I was given a lot of encouragement and heart on working on 'Ideal'
and was thrilled to find how fresh Wilde's own stuff worked. I did
quite
a lot of adapting on 'Ideal' and 'Earnest,' in one sense, I felt if you
went for it needs less meddling with the text. It just needs a little
more
interpreting in different ways."
Wilde's play, of
course,
revolves around Jack Worthing (Firth), a reserved bachelor living a
simple
but responsible life in the English countryside with his romantic yet
romantically
sheltered niece Cecily Cardew (Witherspoon). At times, Jack announces
he
must depart immediately for London to deal with problems involving his
wayward and carefree brother Ernest. As it turns out, there is no
Ernest.
It's Jack who is, himself, Ernest. In London, Ernest's partner in
enjoying
the good life is his spendthrift friend Algernon 'Algy' Moncreef
(Everett).
There's also the rebellious aristocrat Gwendolen Fairfax (O'Connor),
with
whom Ernest is in love. Unfortunately, there's also Gwendolen's mother,
Lady Bracknell (Dench) for Jack to contend with. To say any more about
what goes on will certainly ruin it for those who aren't already
familiar
with Wilde's wonderful play.
While it's been
years since
I saw "Earnest" on stage in London, much of the film's dialogue does
sound
like it came straight from Wilde's text. "Yes, a lot of it is there,"
Parker
said. "Of course, it's stripped down a bit here and there and
reorganized
(in) different scenes. But nearly all of it is Wilde's. The worst jokes
are mine—and we've already removed some of those in the editing. So we
spared the audience some of that. When I was considering it as a play I
knew it better than 'Ideal' originally because I'd been in it onstage
about
10 years ago and was fascinated by it. I got to know the four-act
version,
as well. He originally wrote a four-act version, which was trimmed down
to three before it was ever performed.
"The four-act
version had
some rather interesting characters and ideas, which you could see why
he
abandoned for the play (which opened very successfully on Feb. 14, 1895
at the St. James's Theatre in London). But (they) were quite fun
inspirations
for me in that there were these creditors who come after Algy. And I
began
to think, 'Oh, you could start with Algy running away.' You get a
better
picture of this sort of rake, man-about-town figure and use some of
those
ideas. I was talking with Harvey and he said, 'Yeah, you could start
with
a chase' and I'd literally just been telling Barney that. And for a
moment
I wondered whether we were being bugged. So there was a moment where we
definitely all thought, 'Fun idea.' And then I went away and thought,
well,
I don't want to do it immediately, but actually it all started to form
in my head as an adaptation."
The project began
to evolve,
he noted, "fairly organically. There was a moment when I nearly went
and
did the other one, but that didn't happen. One or two other things came
along. At one stage, I was wondering whether I should direct it, but as
often happens I find the more you work on the adaptation the more
interesting
it becomes for you as a director. You see it more specifically. So it
kind
of went from there, really. It's one of those strange ones where you
expected
a hurdle to crop up any moment and bring you down, but it's almost been
inexorable (that) Wilde will out. And here he is again."
Parker didn't
actually begin
work on the screenplay until about a year and a half ago. "I spent a
few
months on the adaptation," he said, "and then decided it was in quite
good
shape and started to polish it up and talk about actors. Various people
were immediately interested in Rupert. I even discussed the idea with
him
at the press junket for 'Ideal.' He was always interested. He was more
interested in (playing) Lady Bracknell, but Judi was there for that one
in the end. I'm not joking! He would have been marvelous! He sort of
set
a good standard for this and for the tone that we were looking for (by)
straddling the period and giving it a contemporary feel without blowing
its roots.
"Judi was the one
I'd always
wanted for Bracknell. We had a little bit of a headache trying to fit
(it
into her schedule). She did so much work. It was at that sad time when
her husband had died and she was working on about three pictures at
once,
I think. But she was pretty determined and the various producers got
together
and managed to squeeze a few days (from the schedule she'd need to fit
into). She had about 13 days to do all her stuff. She came in and it's
not one of those parts where you can sort of hang about for a couple of
days. You hit the ground and you run, you know. She was amazing. She
did
'Earnest' at the National, probably over 10 years ago. Her main concern
was that it would be a too theatrical grasp of it, but what appealed to
me about her in the first place is that she always brings a very deep
humanity
to whatever she does. For me, that counters any fear you have of it
being
theatrical. It's inevitably going to be theatrical in some respects.
That's
its roots and I don't think you need to shy from it. But, at the same
time,
the bad side of that coin is often a less rooted emotional
characterization.
She's incapable of not giving a full-blooded performance, so I never
had
any fears about that though she (was) a little nervous to start with.
But
within a few epigrams she was roaring along."
While Dench was
almost an
obvious choice to play Lady Bracknell, Parker's casting of Reese
Witherspoon
to play Cecily was more of an inspiration. "I really liked the idea of
Reese, having seen her in 'Election,' " he told me. "It's a tricky
part,
Cecily, because I wanted somebody who's genuinely young. Too often I've
seen it where it's usually somebody pretending to be young and also
pretending
to be sort of innocent and pretending to be a lot of things that end up
being arch, which is the opposite tack we're trying to take with it.
What's
so good about Reese is her terrific directness and I don't mean
fierceness,
but she's got an amazing terrier-like grip on truthfulness. So she
makes
that character for me.
"Immediately you
believe
the context and there's not a wink at the audience or any
tongue-in-cheek.
It's a very strong and genuine performance. It's tricky (to cast)
because
we don't have much experience for young actresses. The two or three
that
were feasible for me didn't have yet the chops on screen. What I liked
(about Witherspoon) is that she is so—mature sounds condescending—so at
home and experienced already at her age. And she brings all that (to
the
role), which is sort of what Cecily is. Cecily is a bit of a tigress in
sheep's clothing. So that was always appealing to me and I liked the
idea
that Algy comes along and here's this pretty little thing he thinks
he's
going to sweep off her feet and actually she's a darned sight tougher
than
you first give her credit for."
Inasmuch as
Witherspoon isn't
English, her accent posed a potential problem. "It's always a nerve
wracking
one because in the casting process—especially if you're dealing with
somebody
who is of some status or name -- you rarely get a chance to work with
them
before offering them the role," Parker explained. "But I did some
research
on her and she's a bit of a good impressionist. She's extremely good at
accents. When she came into rehearsals, she hid her light under a
bushel
for some weeks, but worked like crazy. I kept very close to the coach,
who's definitely one of the best I know and she was extremely
encouraging
about her. What I like about her take is that she doesn't just do an
accent,
she does an accent for the character. She gives it a slightly
old-fashioned
(sound). She puts a lot into it. The thing about Reese is she is a
perfectionist.
She's not going to do it unless she believes in it. She worked like
crazy.
There was a time when I think she was nervous about how much she'd
bitten
off, but she certainly chewed it all by the end. I was incredibly
impressed."
As for Colin
Firth, who plays
Jack, Parker noted, "Colin I know from way back. He's a dear fellow
and,
also, I think what I like about him is that role Jack is often a bit of
a stooge to Algy. Algy tends to have the funny lines and having played
Jack I sort of understood that it's not necessarily appealing. But in
my
adaptation I was quite concerned (about) that. In some ways, his is the
story with the most change to it. I was quite interested to try and get
a little big more compassion into the story than is normally the point.
I would say originally its intention is more satirical and wickedly
sharp.
With time, the objects of satire are perhaps less evident and
particularly
on screen I felt it important to try and create this world where you
give
them a context you believe in a bit more. The great thing about film is
that you can actually draw out the world they're living in much more
and
immediately you're getting a rapport between them and their
environment.
"And Colin, I
find, is a
terrifically detailed and sensitive performer. He can bring the
sensitivity
and complexity (to the role). What I was really thrilled with was I
feel
there's a lot of range to him in this part. I think there are moments
that
I was surprised that they're sweetly affecting. I wasn't quite sure how
they'd turn out. (And that's) partly because of the rapport between the
two guys. They worked together many years ago on 'Another Country' on
screen
and that rapport is there. On set it's there. I'm pretty confident that
that's what sort of (resulted in) what they do on screen. Rupert is a
terrifically
sharp-witted fellow and you've got to keep your own about you. And
Colin
and he had some terrifically good fun almost fraternal tangles. It was
so clearly aimed at what they were doing and they became even firm
friends,
I think, by the end, which was lovely."
Shooting got
underway in
April 2001 at Ealing Studios, the historic British studio that opened
in
1902 and became a center in the '40s and '50s for the production of
classic
British comedies like "The Ladykillers" and "The Lavender Hill Mob."
"We
shot the country stuff at West Wycombe Manor, about 45 minutes drive
west
of London," Parker said. "We saw quite a few places. I was enchanted
with
this one because there's something rather unusual and slightly magical
about the place. It was actually built by one of the founding members
of
the Hell Fire Club in West Wycombe in 1760. His descendants are still
there
now. There's a huge Italianate entrance on the place. A lot of murals
and
very curious little statues. I found it rather intriguing because what
I was looking for in the country was not just the English lovely
countryside
but just a hint of something a bit magical. Its roots are, I think, not
just Restoration, but Shakespeare and, more specifically, 'A Mid-Summer
Night's Dream.' I've always liked the idea that in their dream the
lovers
leave the city and go to the woods where they sort of wrestle with
themselves
and each other. There's something about in this story leaving the town
and strange things sort of happen. These are rather repressed
Victorians,
as many of the upper classes were, and there's a whole lot of
intriguing
fantasies lurking not far beneath that surface. So the play, for me,
had
a bit of that.
"Otherwise, I was
quite keen
in the early stuff just to get a bit of London just to get some
contrast.
Town and country seem to be a quite strong split an image in the piece
in that they sort of reflect Ernest and Jack. They really (only) have a
few scenes at the beginning, but it was crucial that we got them and we
see a sort of humming London and the nightclubs and we seen the
gambling
rooms and then you get more a sense of poor Cecily imprisoned in this
place
until things start to stir up and various intruders arrive. Also, in
the
design I found myself using Luciana Arrighi as set designer. I'd been
working
with her on that Italian thing (Parker's 'Fade to Black' project) and
got
to know her. She's got a lot of flair. I quite liked just little hints
of not-Englishness about it. Partly because Wilde, himself, wasn't, you
know. We sort of claimed him over here, but, of course, he wasn't. He
was
an Irishman with his perspective on it. And it's quite nice having just
a little tilt at it. The costumes were Maurizio Millenotti, who's
worked
with Fellini and Zefirelli. And they knew of each other and worked
together.
I quite liked the combination of their sensibilities."
How did
production go? "There
should be more than 24 hours a day when you're shooting a period
piece,"
Parker replied. "It takes forever to get everybody assembled in their
period
costumes with their period hair on. And then you break for lunch and
they
go down the hill in a car and then you miss two hours for lunch. You
add
up the hours of the day and you think, 'We'd better get a move on. So
that
was a continuous strain. But we had a terrific atmosphere. There was
something
fun about sort of an ensemble piece. I often find with something like
that,
if the majority of the folks are committed to it, it has a momentum of
its own. It seemed to me crucial to have that sort of atmosphere with
this
sort of thing. So it was really enjoyable and there were some lovely
moments.
In the countryside, I'll never forget Judi (driving) around the English
lawny slopes in this sort of golf cart that used to take her from her
(trailer)
up to the set. She used to be driven the first couple of days and after
a while she booted her driver out and you'd see her (driving about
herself).
We called it the Brackmobile. She would race along. On the whole, there
were lots of fun bits. Working with Rupert again was a great treat.
Frances
is, I think, an amazing actress (playing Lady Bracknell's daughter
Gwendolen
Fairfax) and I would work with her again at the drop of a hat."
Asked what it
cost to make
the film, he said, "It was about $12 million. Not bad (with such a
strong
cast involved). We shot for eight and a half weeks. They were all very
generous." Parker then added with a laugh, "They paid to be in it, of
course."
Looking ahead, he
observed,
"Barney's been pushing to do more Wilde. There are various ones around.
Of course, there's 'Dorian Gray.' I don't think I will direct, but I
might
be involved at some level -- maybe a bit of production on it somehow.
But
for the time being I think I need to try and find, at least, another
muscle.
It may be my Italian one (so I'll have) to see if I can do this
thriller.
We're pretty bloody close to it. But it's a tricky one to cast. It's
not
a long list that we can go through. We've got a lot of money interest
now
and we're hoping to be shooting it in September and prep in July. So
it's
sort of there, but I've been closer than 'there' before and not done
it.
I'm not counting my chickens, but I'm hoping to be talking to you about
it."
|